Sunday, December 30, 2007

2008 Catalysts for UTStarcom

With only 1 trading day left in 2007, I look back to the summer of 2004, the first time I bought stock in UTStarcom. The reasons I bought into the stock at the time included the lure of the China market (UT was a pure play on China growth), other emerging markets (possibility of expanding PAS), incredibly profitable/good valuation during a time when the other telecom providers were still languishing (yes, they actually made profits before to the tune of $2 earnings for a $20 something stock with incredible growth), the Beijing olympics in a few years, US-based company/China manufacturing, disruptive technologies, and on and on. After the last 3+ years of poor performance and stock price collapse, those times and the potential for becoming a cornerstone tech company has vanished. All we shareholders are left with is "hope" that they still have enough resources to turn it around and get to profitability.

For me, the investment thesis has been reduced to a short term (1-2 year) turnaround, get to profitability and hope they are acquired. Over the last few years, I've found the competitive landscape has been increasing exponentially and come to the conclussion that you have to have revenues in the $10-15b minimum in order to support R&D, be competitive and keep the cycle going. Because of UTs success in PAS, they have been able to continue their expenses at a level of much larger companies. However, the massive losses and shareprice collapse has shown this cannot continue. China competitors such as ZTE and Huawei have grown immensely just over the last 3 years. Most analysts also believe that UT will have a hard time going it alone with the constant sell rumors that finally culminated with last years failed strategic study. Over the last year, I have accepted this scenario and even viewed the increase spending/new markets as one last push to get to profitability and a more sound exit strategy. Things can always change a year or two from now and others can probably lay out a longer term sustainable model but looking at the history of the company and the competitive landscape today, the best way to increase shareholder value is to shrink the company, focus on profitable markets sooner, and get bought out. With that being said, lets look at catalysts for the company going forward.

On the macro level, UT is actually in much better shape than other telecom equipment makers. UTs main core markets are still in emerging countries. UT customers are some of the strongest and faster growing carriers in the world. China is expected to grow 10% next year on top of 12% this year. India is expected to grow another 8-9% next year. Brazil, Russia, Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, Pakistan, and others are expected to grow much more than in the US. Local consumer demands in those emerging countries are the drivers for growth. Broadband/networking growth according to companies like Cisco have never been better. Therefore, it comes down to UT execution going forward. For the stock price, it has been on a multi-year downtrend and needs "catalysts" to reverse the trend and sustain an uptrend that we shareholders have been waiting for. Here are the upcoming company specific catalysts (some are expected and some we hope for, a fellow shareholder Nawar started this off):

- Debt issue: for UTSI to pay a portion of the debt, and refinance the rest in a none-dilutive manner, or not overly dilutive. A quick summary of liquidity... http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=148249&mid=148249&tof=22&frt=2
- For UTSI to sign multiple IPTV contracts in China, signaling further relaxing of SARFT control on IPTV in China.
- Upgrade of the PAS network, for UTSI to gain a contract to upgrade CN and CT PAS network to allow for fast data.
- Asset divestures: for UTSI to divest some of its none-core assets.
- Q4 results/better outlook: for UTSI to announce decent Q4, and provide better outlook for 2008 then the market expect today.
- New NGN contracts, for UTSI to announce similar contracts to the PLDT contract, showing traction for their other product lines.
As for speculative potential developments:
- A modest buyback of stock..
- Action by Wu or an external party to acquire the company.
- Strategic partnership/joint venture with a key player for any of UTSI product lines.
- An investment in UTSI by a strategic player.

I added the following:

Signing of OEM partners.
Additional IPTV wins outside China (BSNL in India in early 2008?)
Completion of Gemdale/Infinera sale.
Developments in Russia specifically (got to have some developments in the last leg of BRIC countries)
Non-pas/iptv wins in China showing progress from Lu
Positive developments in Starent lawsuit (long shot)
Additional iptv licenses issued in China
Additional GEPON contracts (First phase in Pakistan and GOA in India are done-more expected)
Wimax initial win? http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Business_%26_Finance/Investments/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?bn=27187&tid=147880&mid=147881
Cash flow outlook for 2008 needs to be good.
Announcement of "material" sale/licensing of UT patents (current 1 or 2 that they sold are not material)
Expansion broadband contracts with BSNL with higher margins.
Positive news out of Japan (which has been a while).
-Book to Bill (improvements in core markets).

And, the major catalysts.........PROFITS. The last profitable quarter was Q1 2005 when UT booked the large $290m Japan Telecom contract and earned 29cents for the quarter. Management has once again come out with their getting to sustainable profitability forecasts. This time with a sense of urgency and "committment" to boot. I say this with some sarcasm but with genuine hope after meeting management during the shareholder meeting. The above "catalysts" were mostly laid out by management in their ccs and PRs. There has definitely been major new revenue sources (iptv, broadband, ngn, gepon, ip surveilance), iprovments in PCD (their largest rev source) and cost cuts, but also continued decline in PAS/Japan (highest/most profitable segments).

There are definitely catalysts going forward both at the macro/micro level. Management supposedely is focused with the operations now that the China/options investigations/financials are finished/upto date. Blackmore, the COO, has to sign OEM deals, reduce expenses, and improve overall cash flows. Barton has to finish the Gemdale/Infinera asset sales, extract cash from their patent portfolios, resolve the CB, and better refine the cash flow/profitability expectations going forward (better communications with the street). Lu has to stabilize China PAS revenues and gain new revenue streams in China.

For shareholders and the street, its about seeing RESULTS from the company after years of massive poor performance. I would hope there is sense of urgency. I think it should even be beyond this (panick comes to mind although panick is not a word you want to portray to the street). At $2.7 per share, I encourage ALL shareholders to have management and BOD be accountable for increasing shareholder value. The company still has time and resources. The macro environment has never been better. They have major initial wins already but the stock has not reflected it currently at all time lows. Management has to be passionate and hungry- they have a tremendous opportunity to turn this around. I for one am sick of the potential and seeing the stock price languish here. If management executes, there is no reason that the turnaround will not happen. Then, we can change the conversation to being hugely profitable in the future.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

UTStarcom - Year 2008 Outlook

Another year has passed and the stock price has not only languished this year but has outright collapsed, falling 70%. Its gotten so bad that I even started a blog and went to the shareholder meeting. In the coming year, I plan to have some "fire side" conference calls with shareholders to discuss the companies prospects and progress in their key markets and financial metrics. I would like to invite fellow shareholders to drop me an email if they want to discuss UT in the coming year.

On to the 2008 outlook. Management has been proactive lately in communicating their turnaround plans, financial targets, and key markets. In short, management does not expect a quick turnaround but have outlined some realistic goals going forward. Management does not anticipate turning a profit until 2009 but are trying to make that happen in late 2008 as the best case scenario.

Expenses. The target quarterly operating expense is $115m/quarter. From the CCs and analysts estimates, this is probably conservative and will be in the $100-110m range by the end of the year. Most investors would like it to be further reduced to the $90-100m range. Management has said it is well-aware of investor sentiment and operating under a high sense of urgency so the cuts that they have made after undergoing a 9-week evaluation of all business units suggest that they see revenues ramping up and that the cuts are adequate to get them to profitability. Management has focused attention on bookings (book-to-bill ratios). Up to a few months ago, management has not done this and gives me some confidence it is on the upturn with ratios above 1. Management has indicated expense ratios about 23-25% of revenues (not including PCD). There has been some confusion about this because UT produces their own handsets with R&D expenses and a seperate distribution portion. From the last earnings call transcript and the shareholder meeting, the expense ratios will be based on all revenues not including the distribution portion of the PCD.

PCD. The PCD unit (atleast the distribution part) has been classified as non-core and we hope to see this unit sold. It is not part of the expense ratio metrics described by Blackmore and can bring in substantial cash to the company.

PAS. Unfortunately, the most profitable revenue generator for the company continues to go down. The company has indicated that margins will actually improve and that backlog is still signficant but there is no question this will go down more in 2008. The hope is their improvements and other features (128k packet data) will slow down booking losses. I believe further developments in PAS (good or bad) will impact the shareprice more than some of the iptv announcements in the near term.

Broadband. While the revenues are increasing in India with the coming highlighting their BSNL contracts, it is in the single to mid teens in GMs as of now. Going forward, Blackmore highlighted GMs above 20% so this will contribute much needed margin improvement in 2008. Additional contracts can be expected.

IPTV. This is definitely the company's brightest spot but it can also be the most frustrating because of the timing of revenues due to regulatory issues and content/usage/functionality situations in various countries. Currently, the company has over 600k subscribers and system capacity of over 1 million. Contracts are multi-year and all iptv projections (for both equipment and total revenues) are staggering to say the least. Here is where I believe the best opportunity for the company and more importantly the shareholders are right now. Because of all the previous past disappointments, lack of internal controls, lack of profits, declining PAS, etc, the market is so focused on the timing of these contracts and not the potential markets and UTs own position. Take the solar industry for example, companies are being valued for potential revenues in 2009, 2010 and beyond. Those companies are being given ALL the benefits of a declining dollar, higher oil prices, very high margins, unlimited demand, no supply etc. Bascially, stock valuations have gone up 10-20 fold in some cases. On the other hand, UT plugs along having won in MTNL and Bharti in India (with BSNL soon to follow), 18 deployments in China (60% market share), wins in Brazil, and Taiwan. In the latest Taiwan contract for example, the stock price actually dropped 3 cents. Why? During the last earnings call, Lu detailed the steps to recognize iptv revenue. The company gets a down payment but a majority of the revenues don't get recognized until full deployment or a year from signing. Of the $240m they have booked, only $80m have been signed. So, from this standpoint, you can see why the stock doesn't move a lot. However, these are the opportunities I am talking about. A year ago, there was no India, Brazil, Taiwan, and most China deployments were very early. The fact that industry is starting to open up and UT is winning are very important. The Taiwan contract for example is with one out of the three CABLE companies they are talking to. I don't think this model working with cable companies to augment their offering was discussed previously. In Taiwan alone, they are projecting having 1 million customers in 2009. With Markwell, they are anticipating shipping 500k STB in 2 years! That means UT is going to have huge market share in the country.
In Shanghai alone, they are projecting to have 500k subscribers by 2008. That is in Shanghai alone while winning another 200k contract to be the SOLE iptv provider in Fujian province. By next year, we will have to break down iptv deployments in China to the different cities/provinces. But the key take away is that with most revenue recognition so backended, it is good news that profitability may be expected in late 2008.

In summary, the stock price is reflecting the CB, the continued losses, PAS declines, and a lot of timing issues without regard for their assets, sale of non-core assets, explosive gains in worldwide iptv growth (specifically with UTs now confirmed position), growth in all the "startup" technologies they are still spending $160m in R&D (for years). So, you can look at the shareprice and relate to the negatives which are being dealt with or focus on the positives which are happening and will only get realized as we go forward. The same way with the highflyers of today. You can pay for their "expected" growth for the next 10 years or you can pay for almost $0 for UTs growth with significiant inital contracts already signed and the street not giving any credit for. I know where my money is on.

I'll be travelling to Southeast Asia tonight for vacation so have a wonderful holiday to everyone (ok.. inlcuding the shorts).

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Commentary of Fran Barton (UTs CFO) - Overpaid or Underpaid

As many know, during the last shareholder meeting, I was able to meet and talk with Fran Barton, UTs chief financial officer, and Peter Blackmore, UTs COO and designated future CEO. A lot of people on the message boards think that because of this meeting with Mr. Barton and Mr. Blackmore, that I have suddenly been brainwashed and support all their decisions. While it was a good opportunity to meet with them and discuss certain issues, the final judgement on their performance is the stock price. On this post, I wanted to highlight my thoughts on Mr. Barton just because of the upcoming convertible bond and the fact that he has been with the company for over 2 years.

For those that have followed the message board for some time, they know I have singled out Fran Barton ever since he started and even made a comparisson to UTs former CFO, Mike Sophie. http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=139373&mid=139373&tof=-1&rt=2&frt=2&off=1

People obviously don't have a good impression on any of the management based on the stock performance but Sophie was well versed with the company's operations and was even promoted to COO. But this is not a post to rehash problems with Sophie or even Barton but to discuss Mr. Barton's compensation and the critical resolution of the convertible bonds.

On top of Mr. Barton's pay in 2006, he received a "double bonus" for dealing with the internal investigations and now has a retention clause worth $10m over the next 4 years. There was even an earlier SEC filing that mentioned how important the key management to the success of the company. If you read the fine print on the bonuses, it is NOT tied to the company shareprice and the metrics are really very favorable to management (unfortunately for shareholders). It is very difficult for me or any shareholders to see the stock price near the all-time lows when their CFO is getting increasing salaries, yearly bonuses, and now retention bonuses. The "independent" compensation committee definitely is non-existent and I would love to be in management's position. Anyway, with that ugly background out of the way, Fran Barton can prove his worth to the company AND to the shareholders by resolving the convertible bonds in a way favorable to the shareholders (as he has mentioned plenty of times).

For 2007 alone, the stock price has dropped $6 or $720m in market cap. It is atleast $3 under book value with an enterprise/revenue ratio of 0.04. There are STILL over 30 million shares that are short. Even after being removed from the index where about 15 million shares exchanged hands, the number of shorts outstanding have remained very high at almost 30% of the outstanding shares. This is the immediate battleground that the shareholders are facing in the upcoming year. Barton does not have an easy job with the stock under $3 and they are in yet another "transition" period with the current credit environement and the expense intensive operations they are running. Nevertheless, they have adequate funds to pay off the entire loan or do a bridge loan for part of it. Selling part of the company by offering shares and diluting the current base is really unacceptable and not required. While the company has some cash requirements it has to maintain in China to satisfy Government requirements, they are nowhere near the financial institutions here that need to maintain triple A ratings and capital reserve requirements. Most of their $500m in cash over the last couple of years have been earning interest at 1.9%!

Going forward, the company will report financials for Q4 2007 and give their estimates for 2008. The outlook for 2008 will determine short term cash requirements and vitale for short term credit. This is where Barton's worth will be tested. He single handedly can resolve the CB issue by moving the timeline away to a much better credit situation. The shorts will not have the shares they are counting on to cover their positions. It will not dilute the current share price. On a side note, the other institutional longs that have gotten into redemption situation with owning UT should be in much better situations as well. It seems "obvious" to shareholders on what needs to be done.

Back to Fran Barton's compensation. Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein will get $68.5 m in bonuses while other CEOs will forgoe any bonuses. I would definitely like Mr. Barton's compensation tied to the shareprice but that is wishful thinking. Mr. Barton can prove his worth and more with the correct resolution of the convertible bond. We shareholders can talk about operational performance, iptv, window dressing, etc but the shareprice in 2008 is going to be driven to a large extent by the CB.

Mike Sophie raised a lot of money and did a lot of good for the company but that was during more favorable times. Fran Barton is faced with a much tougher scenario BUT a lower shareprice comes with much lower expectations and can be seen as a springboard to outsized gains. The next shareholder meeting with management will either be a major celebration or an even bigger train wreck. I hope I can tell Mr. Barton how underpaid he is and a job well done..........

Thursday, December 20, 2007

UT continues IPTV momentum with win in Taiwan. BSNL in India next?

One day after closing at the all-time low share price, UT unveiled the Asian iptv customer that they discussed during the last cc. The deployment in Taiwan is as follows:

"The Markwell contract includes system capacity for 500,000 RollingStream IPTV subscribers and 20,000 set-top boxes initially. Markwell plans to deploy an additional 480,000 RollingStream set-top boxes over the next two years."

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/071220/aqth130.html?.v=25

Based on previous discussions on pricing, this contract may yield $20-30m for the intial system setup (hardware+software) and another $3m for the first 20k STB. Maintenance and other revenues for the STB will come later. It normally takes them 3 to 6 months to recognize revenue so it will probably be in Q3 2008.

The deployment in Brazil was for an initial 10k subscribers and system capacity of 50k more so this Taiwan deployment is much larger.

Another PR this week was the official launched of BSNL's multiplay broadband Internet services in India. This was positive because (1) it showed there was no major glitches in this large scale deployment which UT spearheaded, (2) the company can recognize broadband revenue, and (3) can anticipate more expansion contracts in broadband and iptv.

A fellow shareholder (Nawar) posted this on BSNLs launch of iptv on Jan 1, 2008

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071219/asp/calcutta/story_8670469.asp

After the first IPTV win in India from MTNL early this year, UT had mentioned expecting two more wins in India which turned out to be Bharti and now probably BSNL. Reliance in India is working with Microsoft/Alcatel for their iptv but it would seem that it should cost much more with the half a billion contract with Microsoft alone. I am not sure how Reliance can recoup their costs on that venture.

After iptv deployments in Japan, China, India, Brazil, Taiwan, other possible areas could be Chile, Philippines, Pakistan, Korea, and Mexico? Previous articles mentioned trials in 40+ other areas. Also, if more licenses are issued in China or some "city" starts deployment, then the iptv revenue numbers will start to become significant.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

All time closing low - letter to management

It is unfortunate to see the stock hit a new all-time closing low of $2.61 today. The market has been volatile and the year-end selling has pushed UT even lower. I sent an email to management to see if they would be willing to hold an update call or meet with shareholders. The company has done a much better job in communicating with shareholders the last few months but I am taking this "opportunity" now that the stock has hit another low to question management if there are plans to support/defend the stock if it goes any lower. Here is my letter:

Dear Sirs,

Today, the stock closed at $2.61, the lowest closing price in the history of the company and 12% lower compared to 3 weeks ago during the shareholder meeting. While I appreciate the efforts for turning the company around in the long term, I would like to know what (if any) plans does management have to defend the stock price in the short term if it goes lower. Is there any price point that you would consider low enough to prompt a response from management.

I know there are a lot of issues that you have to deal with in the short term such as (1) selling holdings (Gemdale/Infinera), (2) finalizing/implementing cost savings plan, (3) closing the quarter, (4) planning for the convertible bonds, (5) working on/negotiating future contracts, and others. However, the current share price is at a point that I believe deserves your attention, We could all wait for possible further share price deterioration but I think that is unfair to all shareholders and that your responsibility is also to address the share price as it goes lower. I understand your position for focusing on running the business but as I’ve mentioned before, the share price cannot be avoided. I would like to ask if you would be willing to schedule a conference call to update shareholders or to meet with shareholders in Alameda early next year.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Motorola, Palm, and UTs PCD

I was reading the Thursday edition (12/13/07) of the Wall Street Journal and came across a couple of articles regarding Motorola and Palm that were related to UT's PCD and the company in general.

UT has designated the personal communications division (PCD) as none-core and the consensus is this will be sold off/spun off in the future to generate cash and refocus the company to its core networking divisions. During the shareholder meeting, some shareholders asked Hong Lu why it even bought the PCD back in 2004. Hong gave a quick history and mentioned that UT was the biggest handset maker in China previously and that they could leverage the Audiovox division and their own division. A fellow shareholder Nawar has given a good historical perspective on the PCD performance the last few years: http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=147623&mid=147657&tof=1&rt=2&frt=2&off=1

Anyway, how much can the company get for this division if it were to sell it? Here is a base reference from their 2004 purchase: http://utstarcom-stocknews.blogspot.com/2007/11/link-to-uts-audiovox-buy-in-jue-2004.html Based on rev/margin improvements, people are speculating that it could bring in $200-300m or more.

Here is where the Motorola article comes in. Carl Icahn has amassed a 3.3% holding in Motorola and wants to sell Motorola's handset division to release shareholder value (sound familiar :-). Based on Icahn's estimates, the handset division is being valued at $0 right now but should fetch one times yearly revenue of $20billion. Nokia is trading at about 2x yearly revenue. Analysts actually agree with Icahn but notes they have to fix certain problems before it can yield the desired value. The valuations (1x-2x revenue) are not applicable to UTs case because the majority of its handsets are resale/distribution and they don't have anywhere near the margins or brand recognition of Motorola or Nokia. In any case, the takeaway is even Motorola's handset division may be for sale.

There is also the confusion about UTs PCD because it has its own internally designed phones with higher margin and expenses plus the distribution part with higher rev/low expenses. Based on conversations with Barton/Blackmore, my impression is there is no immediate sale and that if any sales comes about, it will only be the distribution part. Let me say that this is just my feeling and I could be way off. Other knowledgable posters may shed more info if this makes sense or not. Anyway, even with the Motorola sale, there is the added problem of the current credit markets. The good thing for UT is that they are the smaller sized handset provider so it is more affordable and anyone that picks up the Motorola handset may just make a clean sweep to eliminate competition. Also, other smaller players that produce generic handsets can decide they only want UTs distribution portion.

What about the Palm article? Palm recently hired Apple's "podfather" Jon Rubinstein to revamp their own operations. Ruinstein has been on the job since July and has been putting in 70-hour weeks (Blackmore came in at the same time). I believe Palm is even in worse situation than UTStarcom. They have less share in their markets, as strong competition as any (heard of Apple and Research in Motion), and have declining revs/demand for their own products (their share of the smartphone market has gone down from 5.4% to 3.6% ouch!). It will also take them 18 months to develop new phones from scratch! UT on the other hand is incresing revs in India, iptv, and other lines of businesses.

One positive about Rubinstein is that 1 million of his stock options are tied to the company's stock hitting 50 to 200% above their grant date. This sounds good from a shareholder perspective but it didn't say how many OTHER options/shares/compensation he got. Anyway, both are turnaround stories but it seems to me UT has a larger chance to turn it around just based on their more diverse businesses, explosive growing and target markets. They have a larger expense ratio so there is that risk but that can be cut anytime as things change.

Another final take away is that other companies are not doing well also. This doesn't fully excuse management's performance but it is a tough environment that they have to navigate through. I feel UTs chances are very good for a turnaround given that they have been doing this for years now and have maintained or increasing their market share even now. A lot of UTs competitiors are also pulling back from certain markets while Nokia, Apple, and Research in Motion continue to assault Motorola and Palms markets. Anyway, its some consolation and things to think about.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

The Convertible Bond - A Perspective

With the coming $275m convertible bond due in March 2008 and the stock languishing below $3, this has become a central point of discussion. The shorts are betting management is going to fall flat on its face and beg to refinace and resolve this issue by diluting and killing the stock. The longs are hoping the company's assets are sufficient to hammer a sufficient deal to avoid a large dilution and make good on their promise to think of the best interest of shareholders.

Back in late 2005, the company had a net $250m of debt but still had signficiant cash flows/backlog from PAS. The company took in $1b in Q4 2005 and began to accumulate cash, reduce debt and to be in position to pay off the rest of the convertible bond. In early 2006, quarterly results were still decent with minor losses. Lu decided to step down and the decision to sell the company was hatched up. We don't know the reasons for selling. Maybe it was due to the slow growth in their end markets. In any case, management spent time focusing on the exit strategy. At this stage, the convertible bond was still almost 2 years away. The acquirer would obviously be on the hook to deal with this and $275m may be "small" to them.

At the end of 2006, the company had amassed a NET cash position of $300m. That seems almost incredible compared to the current market cap of just over $300m. With PAS/Japan revenues falling dramatically now and still little improvements from iptv/broadband, the company started losing signficant amounts. Then, there was the added interest and costs to the investigations. To be fair, the company bought some PCD inventory, paid off suppliers early for discounts, and had some writedowns (hopefully for future contract wins), etc. We found out in July that the cash balance was now down to net $150m and continued losses would mount (we had thought the company would be profitable sometime in 2007).

At about this time, the surprising increase in Gemdale/Infinera holdings brought a windfall of over $100m. This was significant as they could use this to pay some of the debt off and have better leverage for refinancing. The problem was the stock was close to $3 and funds started having their own problems and the liquidity in the market was drying up. Now, things are looking a little better with the rate cuts, the company's own cost cuts/better cash flows. So, things change all the time but there is no doubt that it is much harder to refinance/raise cash with the stock under $3 (as Barton mentioned during our conversation). Nevertheless, I don't think the company has been negligent with the bond debt. It just happened that their main long term debt is coming due at precisely the worse credibt crunch for some time and with the operating performance of the company at all time lows. This is why we shareholders were banking on being profitable sometime on 2007 and hoping they would have cut costs much earlier.

The Gemdale/Infinera sale is a windfall that improves options. Obviously, this has to be discussed. Is the company in very bad shape. It depends on your perspective. I have often cited the worse conditions for the financial and other companies. Countrywide, Citicorp, Lennar, and even JetBlue had to sell assets to maintaintheir operations. Their outlook is even worse while UT performance is going to be much better. Another example is Hoku which is getting over $500m in financing to build a plant and won't be delivering any products until 2009! Financing is the lifeblood of a lot of companies. You can be the stock won't be at $2 and change if the debt was not due in March.

Management has said all options are on the table but with their assets/liquidity, management, S&P and other analysts do not see a liquidity crisis. What remains is uncertainty and how this will play out. Today's JetBlue announcement brought an initial 25% gain. Others (Citicorp, Etrade, Lennar, Countrwide) have had mix reactions depending on the structure. In any case, my view is for a full turnaround and that is only through operational performance. Of course, I would rather see a much higher shareprice once the CB is resolved. We'll see how it plays out.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Sigma Designs and growth of IPTV

Tonight, Mad Money's Jim Cramer picked Sigma Designs as his featured stock. Sigma Designs makes the chips that go into the iptv STB and Blue Ray players. Cramer highlighted yesterday's PR by AT&T and their plans to spend $4.5-5B in their U-verse program suggesting iptv is at the beginning of the growth phase and Sigma Design will be a major beneficiary. He mentioned a target price of $100. I posted yesterday about some of the iptv spending and the U-verse program in particular.

Obviously, I am writing about Sigma Designs because of its link to iptv and UtStarcom. Sigma Designs is a supplier of UtStarcom. Some have wondered why Sigma has such a high market cap compared to UT while having much smaller revenues. Here are some numbers. Sigma currently has a $1.7B market cap compared to UTs $327m market cap. Sigma's GMs are 50% compared to UTs 10-15% (UTs iptv GMs not including STB is over 40%). Sigma grew revs at 50% from last quarter and 164% from last year. UT revs are flat. And finally, Sigma makes $2.5/share while UT is losing $1-2/share/year.

While the financial metrics are like night and day, UT is progressing in iptv winning contracts in Japan, China, India, Brazil, and a yet to be named Asian country. GMs in UTs iptv (not including STB) is over 40% and subscriber growth (while "lumpy") is significant and has reached over 600k subscribers. UT is definitely in a position to benefit from iptv growth as well as Sigma Designs.

Sigma currently has a much better model in that it supplies other providers, has much less operating expenses, and very high overall GMs. While Sigma benefits from providing others, they will get major competition starting in January when Broadcom and others introduce their products. I believe UT's benefits will come later on as they established their foothold in various regions. Thats why its essential that UT get their footprint right now even and why I support current expenses. The critical battles are being waged now. Equipment are being tested and contracts are being awarded now.

I talked with Fran Barton and Peter Blackmore about Sigma Designs and their high market cap compared with UT. As shown above, there are major differences but there is no denying UT's main growth driver going forward will be iptv. What I tried to get at is the higher operational costs and the slow growth/margin of the other businesses. So, I was atleast content on sharing my views on discarding the PCD and other none-core business and lowering expenses when prudent to do so. I believe management knows this anyway but the key to higher shareprices is having the street appreciate the growth in iptv without it being diluted by other slow growth/low margin businesses and obviously the losses.

Unfortunately, UT is still known as a PAS company or a PCD company with huge losses and debt issues coming up. Its painful to see a company like Sigma doing so well when they are UTs supplier. Hopefully, the company will take necessary steps to get to profitability, focus the company on their core businesses and then the street will see the company for its positives. Maybe one day, UT will be mentioned by Cramer in a positive light after all these years. He has gone from hating the company (he doesn't trust those guys) to pitying it the last time saying how much it has hurt shareholders and alluding to all the potential and missteps.

The potential is still there. There is still time and UT has the technology and the market is at the very beginning. It is up to management to manage resources well to get the company back to its glory days of growth and profitability.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

IPTV Spending

"AT&T expects to spend between $4.5 billion and $5 billion on U-verse through 2008. The deployment is expected to reduce 2008 earnings by 12 to 14 cents a share."

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071211/at_t_analysts.html

"Bharti would be investing Rs 150 crore in the initial phase."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Airtel_to_venture_into_IPTV_DTH/articleshow/2478365.cms

Here is the well known $500m Reliance-Microsoft pact...

http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Nov05/0,4670,IndiaRelianceMicrosoftTV,00.html


UT has won Bharti but probably not Reliance. The spending above definitely is not only for the iptv equipment but overall buildouts but the fact that amounts are huge shows the committment of suppliers and operators to iptv.

AT&T only has 126k subscribers at the end of Sept compared to UTs over 600k subscribers right now. AT&T is targetting 1 million by end of 2008. UT could have 2-3 million by end of 2008. The figure from Bharti is about $35 million for their "initial phase". We are not sure what this figure consists of or if this is for the 150k initial subscriber target. Reliance's $500m for the software is staggering. How can they recoup this? In any case, UT will get their share and the trend is growth in iptv will be huge. Also, if the iptv equipment by others do not work or do not scale, UT may have a shot at taking over. The high cost by other systems and the fact that UTs can scale and has been tested worldwide and been around shows this is very possible and would be a major development.

Monday, December 10, 2007

UT deploys in Brazil, 3rd leg of BRIC countries

Today, UT confirmed deployment in Brazil, one of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) countries that the talking heads usually discuss for growth opportunities.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/071210/aqm095.html?.v=32

As with the other countries, it has taken time for actual deployments following tedious regulatory and trial phases.

Back in Aug. 8, 2005, UT provided equipment for a 2000 line system to Telemar.

http://sev.prnewswire.com/computer-electronics/20050808/NYM03908082005-1.html

On June 7 , 2005, UT and Cisco partnered in Brazil.

http://sev.prnewswire.com/computer-electronics/20050607/SFTU07107062005-1.html

The announced contract today was already hinted at from previous press clippings in Brazil (See iptv links).

Going forward, we hope to hear news about the Asian iptv customer that management has discussed in the last CC and during the shareholder meeting. From talking with Peter Blackmore, UT is just waiting until the customer gives approval to release the news. The current speculation is either Korea, Taiwan, or Vietnam.

While the stock stays stagnant, this news in Brazil is yet another data point for the long term turnaround for the company.

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Oversold and the $3 mendoza line

There has been a lot of discussion regarding the book value and the discount the market is assigning to UTStarcom. Analysts have lowered price targest to the $3-3.5 range. S&P, which once had a sum of the parts valuation of $11 earlier this year now has a $3.5 target or about 60% of book value.

Explanations for the low price ranged from continued losses into 2008, lack of visibility, poor management, bad internal controls, bloated expenses, stiff competition, bad regulatory environments in their core iptv markets, low margins, shorts piling on, long funds having to force liquidate, lack of near-term catalysts, end of the year tax selling, greedy management, lack of BOD oversight, uncertainty in refinancing CB and short term loans, and others.

Facing all of this, the stock has dipped under the mendoza line and has become unmarginable further increasing selling pressure as margin traders have to liquidate or cannot buy using their holdings. This has made just keeping UT very expensive from the loss of buying power.

Anyway, just wanted to recap the share price history under $3. Despite all of the above selling pressures, UT has held the 52 week low back in August and have managed to sneak above the mendoza line ($3) for the most parts. A "trend" is starting to develop where the stock trades under $3 for about 6-8 days and then starts going up. These are the following dates and number of trading days under $3.

8/7-8/16 (8 days)
8/22-8/31 (8 days)
9/10-9/17 (6 days)
11/1-11/12 (8 days)
11/15- current (14 days)

The number of days show that it takes time for the margin players to get washed out and some time for longs to get confidence back and see if the lows will hold. I believe the stock is definitely in oversold territory even in the very short term (14 days under $3). The lack of news and low volume means the stock can continue to stay under $3 towards the end of the year but at some point will break above $3 and hopefully won't look back. What the data does say is don't go on margin but definitely buy under $3.

Monday, December 3, 2007

IPTV Revenue for hardware, software, and STB

This is a response to Tigre and Shadow's discussion regarding Unit costs for UTs IPTV system.

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=146545&mid=146686&tof=62&rt=2&frt=2&off=1&p=zg17j6DAWsehBrnpIXT_5T1OwDMyix.sVkMYZ92W97HQGtpKJqu0EBM-

Tigre concluded that per line hardware cost on the average is $15-20, $20-25 for software, and $80 for STB. From the Q&A session, we found out that per line cost is $10-30. I would assume this is for hardware and that STB is over $100. In addition, iptv GMs were 40-45% without STB and the STB was under 20%.

Just some rough estimates on the $240m in total iptv revenues that UT reported for 500k subscribers and 2m system capacity. Using $45 per line cost and $120 for the STB, I get the following:

2mil*$45 = $90m
$150m/$120 = 1.25m STB as part of the overall iptv revenue

Using 15% GMs for STB and 42.5% GMs for iptv hardware/software leads to

$150m(.15) + $90m(.425) = 60.75m in gross profits or 25% overall GMs.

Its in the overall ballpark of the GMs discussed all along. I'd like to commend Tigre and Shadown once again for bringing up an important topic and for zoning in on some proper numbers.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Recap of Q&A sessions from the shareholder meeting

Shareholder Meeting.

I attended the shareholder meeting today held at the Alameda corporate office. From management side, Hong Lu, Peter Blackmore and Fran Barton were the main speakers. Also in attendance were Susan Marsch (General Counsel), Thomas Toy (Director), other employees, and their auditors. Before I get into the details, I’d like to thank management for conducting a professional shareholder meeting, taking questions from shareholders during the Q&A portion and showing us their current line of products afterwards.

The initial part of the meeting dealt with administrative issues such as Thomas Toy’s nomination and confirmation as a Tier 1 director and reconfirming PriceWaterhouseCooper as their auditors. Then, Blackmore, Lu and Barton each took time to discuss the company business. I will skip their presentation for now as that is recorded and I can listen and summarize that at a later time. I want to move to the Q&A portion that was not accessible to the general public. The format for the Q&A portion was to have each shareholder have an opportunity to ask 1 question and if time permitted, additional questions would be taken. I think it was a good idea for them not to include this in the web-cast for the shareholder’s privacy and the unpredictability of the line of questioning and discussions. There were about 10 shareholders that attended, a few flying in from out of town and one from Mexico! There were no analysts present. I was working in San Francisco and took off from work in the afternoon to go across the Bay. I was concerned with the initial thought of the Q&A session being recorded because we may not have the opportunity to ask as many questions and again would be too unpredictable. That being said, I was also worried that frustrated shareholders would pull punches if it was recorded.

I’m pleased to report that the Q&A session was very candid, open, and sometimes heated starting with the initial question regarding the sale or lack of sale of Gemdale (only 10% has been sold). As you can imagine, each person had multiple questions and management did a good job in responding and moving it along. The questions included:

Why was only 10% of Gemdale holdings sold?
What is the average infra revenue per iptv subscriber deployment?
What are the available options to deal with the convertible bond?
Can you get financing in China?
Will they try to get financing in China or the US?
Why not cut costs further if most of the core technologies are already developed?
What were the details for the ML strategic study? Where there offers for the entire or part of the company?
Based on the current low share price and positive expectations by management for the future, would you consider share buybacks and/or insider purchases? (my question)
What valuation did the board have in mind (my follow up question to the ML discussion that I asked Mr. Toy– I got to ask two questions J and anything directly related to the stock price was applauded by the shareholders)
If iptv is positioned as the growth driver, why are the overall margins relatively low?
Can you clarify your opex to core revenue ratios and the potential core revenues in 2009?
Can you comment on the high short position?
Discussion on PAS revenues-packet data 128kbps (not sure if this was in the general discussion or Q&A)

After the formal Q&A session, they lead us to another room for a more informal one on one discussions and to show us their products. The group basically broke up into two separate groups of shareholders, one with Hong Lu and one with Fran Barton and Peter Blackmore. I spent my time with the 2nd group and had very open and candid discussions primarily with Fran Barton and a bit with Peter Blackmore. After the shareholder meeting, I met up with some of the other shareholders and discussed the meeting and compared notes for another half an hour or so. So, the entire event lasted a little over 3 hours for me. After the more formal Q&A session, the following items were discussed in the more informal session:

· PCD and its place within the company now and in the future
· OPEX- how it is currently bloated even with the planned cuts
· Lack of disclosure during the yearlong quiet period when financials were released
· Discussion on timing of the turnaround
· Why were the previous estimates from Barton so far off?
· Any updates on the recent BSNL tender for GEPON/WIMAX gear
· Info on the WiMax gear shown on their website. Potential market and position within their company in the future
· Updates on Japan revenue
· When will the new iptv Asian customer win be announced?
· Different handsets in the marketplace and if UT was involved with them
· Lu discussed the reasons for originally purchasing the PCD
· Lu discussed the iptv competitors and how their product compared to them
· Lu discussed his impression of the shorts. Someone asked Lu how they can break the shorts
· Lu discussed the impact of the Verizon’s decision on opening up their network
· Lu also discussed Japan ADSL and position of various operators in Japan
· Lu discussed their position as handset integrator for Verizon and others
· What are institutional reactions to the current share price?
· Selling or borrowing against the China building

There are probably more items discussed as I was only in one group and just heard part of Lu’s discussions with the other group.

So, what are my general takeaways from the shareholder meeting? The shareholders did not pull any punches making their frustrations, concerns, and suggestions known. To management’s credit they answered everyone’s questions and are well aware of all the shareholders concerns. Obviously, this was a very difficult environment with the stock price at $3. While I don’t agree with everything done in the past, I believe they are taking reasonable stapes at this stage to return the company to sustainable profitability. It’s a line and management position that we have heard plenty of times before (cutting costs, improving controls/efficiencies, waiting for market to grow, using partners, using OEMs, having great products, concern about shareholder value, etc). I had gone in thinking there was no good option at this juncture anyway so I would be in no matter what. Having talked with management, I have “hope’ that much better times are ahead and somehow things are different this time. Maybe, I’m a sucker for a happy ending. In the short term, not selling the Gemdale position may hurt the stock but it was going to be difficult to go against the bad stock technicals and at this late in the year anyway. The turnaround is not going to occur right away as we all know.

Some thoughts on Peter Blackmore, the future CEO of the company. I paid close attention during the Q&A portion and he was in agreement with the shareholder concerns and you could see him often nodding. I think he is very sharp, is the right person for getting the cost structure right and making UT very competitive on the cost side. I believe he understands the company assets and potential markets that UT has and can lead the company back to profitability and higher share prices. Obviously, this was a shareholder meeting and management has to be generally upbeat so we still need to track their progress and COMMITMENT to profitability.

As mentioned, I had more discussions with Fran Barton and thank him especially for his candidness and willing to engage the shareholders. As most know, I am not a techy like Tigre/Shadow so it was enjoyable to discuss the stock price, the way the street values UT, his previous and current estimates, etc. Ultimately, I hope they are able to better predict their business operations to make necessary changes to their cost basis and to better communicate with the street. Towards the end of the Q&A session, I specifically wanted to thank management for updating the shareholders and having all of those CC. I hope they continue and more importantly hope it will be under much better operational performances.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Zacks keeps sell rating and reduced price target to $3

Two days before the shareholder meeting and following S&Ps and BofAs $3.5 and $3 targets, Zacks reduces its 6-month price target to $3.

http://biz.yahoo.com/zacks/071127/10399.html?.v=1

The key reasons include:

1. Lack of business momentum and declining GMs.
2. Not expecting profits till 2010. Company financials do not reflect the anticipated synergies from the restructuring activities.
3. Possible default of convertibles.
4. No near term growth elements.

I agree with the near term profitability picture as losses of 41 and 28 cents are expected for Q4 and Q1 but I would disagree with the declining GMs (these are set to go up from 10 to 13% and improve in 2008), no profits till 2010, default on convertibles, and near term growth elements (need to check bookings and new wins). I do agree with the financials not reflecting the restructuring activities because these won't be felt until Q1.

Hopefully, the current low shareprice and reports like this will spur management to make significant structural changes and make tough choices that they have not done in the past. If so, then we can look at these months as the bottoming phase and look forward to the long-awaited turnaround.

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Letter to management

This is a letter that I will be sending to management ahead of the shareholder meeting.

Dear Sirs,

I have been a shareholder for the better part of the last three years and have been very disappointed with the company/stock performance to say the least. The recent filings show the continued losses in 2006 and 2007 but more importantly, the street has lost confidence in the company due to their lack of communication during these critical times, poor internal controls, bloated expense structure, and lack of visibility in the company’s businesses. The continued losses into 2008 and history of over-promising and under-delivering has weighed on the stock.

It is very difficult to stay positive in light of the current sub $3 share price and know it will take some time to turn this around. I do have some hope with the recent actions from the company such as (1) finishing the options/China investigations-filing the financials for the last 5 quarters, (2) reclassifying and selling long term holdings in Gemdale/Infinera, (3) being able to transfer funds from China, (4) identifying core/non-core operations, (5) cutting operating expenses to $115m/quarter, (6) seeking out cash flow efficiency savings, (7) monetizing the patent portfolio, (8) showing tractions in iptv/broadband, gepon, optical, surveillance and other new initiatives and (9) hopes for profitability in late 2008/early 2009.

I have recently started a web-blog at http://utstarcom-stocknews.blogspot.com. So far, it has generated about 600 visits in just the last 12 days. The purpose of the blog is to compile information about the company, share investor opinions, and hopefully provide a conduit between shareholders and management. One of the reasons I am writing now is to discuss topics in the upcoming shareholder meeting. Because the stock price is at historic lows right now, shareholders have many questions on the company’s future turnaround plans as well as previous decisions and results. Let me emphasize that as much as we’d all like to move on towards the future, we need to learn from the past. With the stock being where it is, it is apparent that the street is also not moving into the future yet. Most stock price targets are in the $3.5 range and continued significant losses are expected in 2008.

A few topics that I have put on a poll (in the web-blog) that management can hopefully give more color to in the shareholder meeting are the following:

-Details of the strategic options study with Merrill Lynch. Shareholders are very dissatisfied with the explanations and lack of details surrounding such a critical event in the company. Where there offers to buy the company? At what price? If not, what where the major issues? What where the attractive points and negative points? We shareholders can appreciate that some information cannot be disclosed but I am also sure you understand where we shareholders are coming from in light of the shareprice.
-Gemdale/Infinera sale. Updates regarding liquidity are very important during these credit tough times.
-PCD divestiture. Most shareholders did not buy into the company with the PCD in mind and are mostly in favor of divesting the PCD to solidify liquidity position and focus on core businesses. I can appreciate that you cannot divulge too much but anything towards the divestiture of this division will help the shareprice. For me, this was the symbolic move away from core goals of the company and would represent a symbolic re-focusing the goals of the company.
-Japan revenues. Shareholders have not heard much regarding Japan and the close ties with Softbank.
-Convertible Bond update.
-Share repurchase or insider buying. The low share price has to be addressed by management. Projections are great but the street is looking for tangible actions by the company/management.

-OPEX and growth of the Core businesses. There are major concerns that the target opex to core revenue ratios that management has given in the last cc will not be met anytime soon (even in early 2009 and be sustainable) and that opex should be cut further now rather than later. Updates to bookings and future plans are much needed to clarify confusion with this important goal. Aside from 3rd party projections, what do you see in the iptv/broadband markets that give you confidence in attaining these ratios? Otherwise, this is another example of over-promising and under-delivering.

I would like to end by stating I appreciate the updates from the company and hope that it continues. The last conference call presented a very good start to addressing the street concerns but results are needed. Because the turnaround will not occur overnight, shareholders need answers to a lot of questions and management can do much more to defend the share price right now. I am personally looking forward to meeting management during the shareholder meeting next week and hope to get some answers to share in the web-blog to fellow shareholders.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

IPTV in Korea/Vietnam-Next front for UTStarcom?

Thanks to Nawar for providing updates on Korea IPTV.

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=ts&bn=27187&tid=146476&mid=146476&tof=1&frt=2

http://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20071122/tbs-markets-korea-hot-b8dd11d.html

From the last CC,

"In particular the IPTV business continues to gain momentum. Attributively we have booked approximately 240 million in IPTV contracts and recognized approximately $80 million in revenue. We recently won new contracts in Fujian Province in China and a major new customer in another Asian country, which we can announce in a few weeks. We currently have IPTV deployments in China, Japan, India and Brazil. We have about half a million live IPTV subscribers and contracts for about 2 million subscriber system capacity.

We are not sure if Korea is the next deployment for UT. Some are speculating Vietnam but the growth of worldwide iptv acceptance is good for UT. The trends support explosive growth in iptv:

http://www.telecompaper.com/news/article.aspx?id=193418&nr=&type=&yr=

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

The bull case for longterm share price appreciation

Let me begin by saying that earnings the last 2 years have been bad and going to be bad in 2008 again. Just looking at the earnings estimates for 2008, analysts are expecting losses of $1.02/share. That is a frightening number when compared with the current stock price of $3.3. The street is waiting for the company to be profitable or at least be cash flow positive. Target prices are a fraction of book value. While this may seem reasonable and a reality of the current moment, this ignores the strategic position and assets the company has. For the past few months, I and others have added up liquid assets (cash, investments, and even the PCD) to size up the current situation and assess potential for a liquidity crisis that could negate any potential for a future turnaround. This was necessary because we did not have access to the financials, did not know whether the company was going to be sold/go private, did not know how quickly they would burn through cash, the impending convertible bond situation or the status of the current business itself.

Through the filing of 5 quarters of past results (Q3/Q4 of 2006, and Q1-Q3 of 2007) and update conference calls, I can say that I have never felt as confident about the turnaround as I have now. What turnaround am I talking about here? The share price going to $6, 10, 15, 20 or higher? No, the turnaround will be about discarding none-core assets, reducing bloated expenses and growing core revenues in the sectors and countries with explosive growth. Most of the long shareholders that bought 2 to 3 years ago had this in mind but circumstances and company mismanagement has moved away from this. Now, I can see the beginning of getting back to this situation/goal. Let me highlight some key developments recently:

-Separating the core and none-core business. The acquisition of the PCD division was the beginning of the downturn, moving away from their core goals/competency. It tried to cover up revenue loss from PAS and the company moved away from growth to a low margin company with losses and lost direction. Now, management has decided to realign the business units and separate the PCD division. Most shareholders have been talking about separating and selling the PCD for a long time now. On the last CC, Blackmore is basing target R&D and SG&A ratios to revenue that does not include the PCD. An analyst also asked about operating expenses for the PCD under the cover that the PCD is the largest revenue source for the company. However, this is really to value the PCD for sale in 2008, which even S&P concedes will probably happen.

-Growth drivers. Broadband and IPTV. UT current has 500k live subscribers and 2m system capacity. Current booked revenues are $240m, which only $80m has been recognized. These are not impressive numbers considering trials have been going on for years and the amount of R&D and other expenses they have incurred to acquire/develop the technology. However, the key take away is that commercial deployments have started and UT is the leader in very large markets. They have commercial deployments in Brazil (10,000 subscriber deployment now confirmed with Brazil Telecom), China (over 60% market share and 380k live subscribers-compared with 800k for PCCW-leader in HK, also was awarded sole provider for one province), India, and a new Asian country to be announced. UT is also providing the massive NGN/broadband infrastructure that needs to be built to support IPTV and other related products (65% market share in Korea, replacing old Siemens, Alcatel equipment in the Philippines, where other Asian telecoms are reviewing the deployments). The market is aware of this but is focusing on the “timing” when broadband/IPTV revs are going to hit. With the liquidity issue aside, I am more concern now about market share and start of deployments.

-Other technologies/drivers. Gepon, IP surveillance, FMC, new PAS technologies etc will provide future growth as well. Even with all the losses, the company is able to maintain R&D. There is a difference between a dying company burning cash and a company “choosing” to maintain R&D because they see the bookings and potential markets. This really is about the longer term growth and profitability so I agree with the steps taken now.

-China market. Almost every other company tries to get in China and increase revenue there. For the last 3 years, China revs have been declining and they are reducing head count and expenses. Since June, Lu has spent time there and have hired new management, improved controls/customer relationship and looking into the broadband market aside from iptv/pas. Aligning the PAS business back into core was smart to do. They cannot lose the relationship built up over the years. I am happy to see the company is refocused in China.

-Liquidity. This is a concern due to the current cash burn and CB due March 2008. The company was fortunate to have Gemdale and Infinera increased. Barton mentioned they have started monetizing Gemdale last week. They are able to transfer significant sums of money from China and have a target to reduce OPEX to $115-120m. At end of Q4, they still should have over $200m net cash and if they are able to extend the CB, would have half a billion to see this turnaround through.

The timing of the turnaround has always been questionable but this depends on the definition as well. For me, the turnaround has started and will be symbolized by the sale of the PCD division. Blackmore has targeted end of 2008/early 2009 to realize his target ratios. Previous discussions of profitability were not believable because there was no plan. Now, there are cost cuts and bookings to guide management.

The management has laid down a reasonable timeframe and benchmarks. Previously, I had lost hoped and wanted a sale. We are way past that point at this stage and prepared to wait it out. I think the strategy has a very good chance of working and the share price will appreciate significantly.

Monday, November 12, 2007

S&P Lowers 12 month target to $3.5

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=145807&mid=145807&tof=20&frt=2

Thanks to Rspen for posting this early today.

S&P has now cut their 12 month target price from $11 early this year all the way to $3.5 now. I can understand the cut due to disappointment in earnings pushout. But, not due to sum of the parts analysis, specially after their investments have gone up by over $100m. Remember, that sum of the parts analysis at $11 was just early this year! Definitely does not make sense.

Now, lets take a look at their estimates going forward. For 2008, they estimate 2% gains from 2007. That obviously has to go up for a couple of reasons. Q3 and Q4 revs are significantly higher than current estimates. Also, book-to-bill have been 1 to 1.2. They do have a 16% GM estimate but that could change significantly depending on mix and timing. Overall, they have a 87 cent loss for 2008. Thats actually higher than consensus right now but the consensus should go up some. It will be interesting to see how estimates are revised after Q3....

Q3 2007 CC transcript

http://seekingalpha.com/article/53890-utstarcom-q3-2007-earnings-call-transcript?source=yahoo

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Q3/Q4 earnings/revs expectations

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=144725&mid=144725&tof=-1&rt=2&frt=2&off=1

Q3 and Q4 revs are much larger than analyst estimates but GMs are much less in Q3 because of the large PCD mix. On my yahoo post, I was using managements 15% guidance for rev growth in Q3 but it turned out to be 20%. On the surface, this was good but it lowered the revs I was guestimating in Q4. I was expecting the loss to be much lower in Q4 (35 cent analyst predictions) but it seems like its going to be around 26 cents. Still better than expectations but not as big a beat as I was expecting. Q4 could still turn out to be better in revs and GMs so it may come in lower than 26 cents. We'll just have to wait and see what the analysts come up with by next week.

Link to UTs Audiovox buy in June 2004

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2004/jun/1047983.htm

This was the $165 million buy back in 2004 that now makes up the PCD. This division now makes up more than 60% of revenues but still deliver only 4 to 6% in GMs.

Management has seperated the PCD from the core division and may sell this off in the next year or two. This would definitely help cash flow and focus the company on their core higher margin business.

Gemdale and Infinera holdings

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_(A_to_Z)/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=144872&mid=145200&tof=-1&rt=2&frt=2&off=1

Thanks to Tech and Tigre for sorting out UTs exact holdings in Gemdale.

Telephonyonline series of articles on UT

http://telephonyonline.com/iptv/technology/china_iptv_utstarcom_042307/index.html
http://telephonyonline.com/mag/telecom_china_grabs_global/index.html
http://telephonyonline.com/iptv/technology/iptv_lessons_china_051007/index.html
http://telephonyonline.com/iptv/technology/utstarcom_china_iptv_051607/index.html

Ericsson + UT

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_U/threadview?m=tm&bn=27187&tid=143433&mid=143433&tof=518&frt=2

ML-Report

This was originally posted by on_board_to on Nov. 2, 2006.

To early to be bullish – downgrade to SellUTStarcom’s share price has almost doubled from its lows in June earlier this year. We are downgrading our rcommendation from Neutral to Sell, as we see little evidence that the company’s business model has improved so drastically,and we now believe that the shares are overvalued on both PE and P/B.Operating outlook firming gradually, but in the priceWe have not revised our earnings forecasts, which are ahead of consensus for FY07. While consensus expects the business to remain lossmaking in FY07, we continue to anticipate a gradual improvement in UTStarcom’s operating positionfrom a narrower net loss in FY06 to a nominal profit in FY07 and FY08.Anticipating one key driver, but too many uncertaintiesWe continue to believe that UTStarcom’s outlook hinges on the development of the IPTV industry in China and possibly other parts of the world. However,UTStarcom’s other businesses (PAS and handsets) are likely to exert anincremental drag on the company’s overall operating performance. In addition, it appears that further cost cuts remain central to a successful turnaround.M&A could be a factor, but not necessarily an easy solutionWe concede that management efforts to restructure the operations may result in a sale of some assets that could unlock value for shareholders, but we also believethat this is likely neither a quick nor an easy fix given the divergent profile of the various business units in UTStarcom.PAS - likely to worsen as mobile penetrates rural marketsThe delay in 3G license issuance in China has given UTSI’s PAS handset and infrastructure business a respite in 2006. The PAS franchise has also been aided by improved profitability due to more modest competition and cost savings initiatives at UTStarcom. However, PAS remains in structural decline, and the rising penetration of GSM mobile into the rural market continues to eat into PAS’addressable market.UTStarcom has benefited as the delay in 3G license issuance in China has held back China Netcom and China Telecom from entering the 3G arena, at the likely expense of capex on PAS network upgrades and expansion. Instead, CNC andCT have started deploying UTSI’s Qbox “3 in 1” solution (DSL modem, PAS inhouse base station, and WLAN in 1 box). UTStarcom has also upgraded its PAS radio network infrastructure solution to support WAP packet-mode data (asopposed to circuit based). There is no infrastructure change, but spectrum efficiency should improve. UTSI is also working independently and with the carriers to explore new business models for PAS to sustain the revenue streamas long as possible.
3G remains a looming threat on the horizonFurthermore, the issuance of 3G licenses is more imminent as we approach 2007, and capex for PAS is likely to suffer when the decision is finally made to proceed with 3G – as the fixed line carriers are widely expected to shift theirattention to 3G network development.Handset – insufficiently profitable to matterWe remain most confused by UTStarcom’s handset strategy. Two years after the acquisition of Audiovox, UTStarcom’s handset operations remain a low margin business. It is not big enough to be a major handset vendor, and still operatesmore as a distributor than a true OEM given limited internal development capabilities. As such, the handset business suffers from low profitability with midsingle digit gross profit margins. The company is relying on niche solutions like the comparatively new T66 dual mode GSM/CDMA handset to win share, but we see these as relatively finite opportunities that are unlikely to make the company a serious player in the handset market. As such, we believe that there is limited revenue and margin upside for this business given the following factors:ô€‚„ The increasingly competitive overall landscape for mobile handsets,ô€‚„ The challenge of increasing value added without increasing development costs, and ô€‚„ Inability to attain critical economies of scale and scope needed tobreakthrough into the next level of the market.Management believes that it can improve GP margins, and that this is the key to improved profitability given that expenses are mostly fixed. While we agree that there is some upside potential to gross margins, given the low base of the current distribution oriented model, but we are also cautious of inflating expectations forthis business given the intensely competitive nature of the handset market.Wireless broadband - looking for an exit?After a series of M&A deals in 2004 and 2005, UTStarcom has been consolidating its wireless broadband initiatives. It is now primarily focused on radio network controllers (RNC) for TD-SCDMA technology in China. The company has exited the WCDMA infrastructure business, but continues tomaintain customer support for TD-CDMA projects that were deployed by PCCW in the UK. The company remains active in developing wireless access solutions using CDMA EV-DO, Wimax and PAS technologies.
Broadband - urgent expansion needed to offset PAS declineIn our view, the emerging broadband wireline business offers the best chance ofoffsetting the pressure from the shrinking PAS franchise. However, business visibility remains limited due to regulatory and technological factors. In addition, analogous to the rapid commoditization of the DSLAM market, we fear thatUTStarcom ultimate profitability for new broadband businesses may ultimately be subject to similar margin pressures, due to the consumer orientation of the services to be supported.IPTV – looks promising, but can it deliver?UTStarcom is already in a position to support the total value chain for IPTV in China and in other markets around the world. In China, the company’s partnership with the Shanghai Media Group has given UTSI a leading position inthis emerging market segment. It is anticipated that the government will soon issue more licenses. One of the strengths of UTSI’s IPTV solution in China, is itscontent mgmt platform (CMP) that has been a key requirement for the State Administration for Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) to embrace broader IPTV deployment and commercialization. Nevertheless, management continues to offer conservative guidance on commercial prospects for IPTV in China - noting that although constant development is underway, it will take some time to realize its full potential.10-40% boost to gross profits possible if IPTV takes offUsing simple, conservative assumptions, we estimate that IPTV in China could boost UTSI’s current gross profit base by at least 10% conservatively and up to 20-40% per annum going forward. This does not take into account reducedcontributions from PAS handsets and infrastructure which currently contribute ~40% of UTSI’s gross profits.Assuming 10% penetration of the approximately 80+mn urban households in China in the next 5 years, with UTSI capturing a maximum market share of 50% only gives 4mn subs on UTSI equipment. At an estimated revenue of $200 persub (including backend CPE and subscriber STB), the revenue opportunity translates into up to $160mn in annual sales for UTSI. We estimate gross margins would range from 40% for CPE to <20%>90% TV householdpenetration in China and more significantly, projections for almost 50mn broadband internet subscribers in China at the end of 2006 and about 60mn at the end of 2007. However, these numbers do not take into account that some of the connections may not have the necessary infrastructure to carry higher bandwidth IPTV signals, or likely competition from digital TV rollout by cable operators.In the mid to longer term, we believe that the potential Chinese IPTV market is could be between 30-60mn households. Even if UTSI’s market share was only 30% and blended gross margins were only ~25%, the potential margin contribution to UTSI could still be up to 2 – 4x higher than our conservative baseline scenario above. The question we cannot answer at this time is how quickly this potential can be realized.Geographic outlook - mixed Beyond China, which remains a critical market for both PAS and IPTV, UTStarcom is trying to build on its momentum in India, defend its position inJapan and build on its wireless handset franchise with North American mobile operators, and other markets in theUTStarcom appears well positioned in the IPTV value chain in China Management continues to offer conservative guidance on IPTVBase case scenario has IPTV accounting for >10% growth in gross profits, assuming other businesses do not declineIPTV likely to face competition from digital TV and possibly inadequate broadband infrastructure
IndiaUTSI remains bullish on its prospects in India, where it believes that it is the leading broadband wireline infrastructure provider – serving all tier 1 customers inthat market. UTSI is currently participating in IPTV trials in India, and is hopeful that it will be able to leverage its early success in China into a similar position inChina. We believe that it is too soon to tell.Japan While UTStarcom had previously benefited from rapid deployment of broadband services by Yahoo BB/Japan Telecom, this business has slowed as Softbank has shifted to focus on wireless with its acquisition of Vodaphone Japan. We do not anticipate a quick bounce back there unless Softbank reorients its strategy.Earnings outlook – no margin for error The near term earnings outlook is for losses to continue through the end of 2006.However, the company expects to breakeven in 1H07, and our model suggests that this can be achieved if costs are cut further and there is no revenue slippage. However, we caution that based on current assumptions, the margin for error is slim, and failure to deliver adequate revenues or cut costs will result in further losses in FY07 and even FY08.ô€‚„ To this effect, management is focused on the following initiatives:ô€‚„ Further internal reorganization,ô€‚„ Refocusing resources on key product lines that matter,ô€‚„ Improving scalability of new product development efforts, andô€‚„ Focusing on key customer accounts.3Q06 guidance – losses to continue Management presented 3Q06 guidance for revenues of ~$590–625mn, with blended gross margins of 16.5–18.5%. The company projected operatingexpenses of ~$135–140mn (including ~$4mn in stockcompensation). EPS for the coming quarter was projected to a loss in the range of $0.23 – 0.33. Taxes are expected to be around $3mn in the quarter.In 3Q06, the following gross margins are expected for UTSI’s different product groups: Handset are projected at >5%, PAS is expected to be 23-25%, wireless infrastructure is expected to be 45-47%, and broadband is expected to bebetween 17-19%.
FY06 guidance – losses likely to extend into 4Q06For the full year, UTSI management expects to report a net loss, but to generate positive cashflow. The company is targeting to return to profitability in 1H07. Fundamental problem - more operating cost savings needed A key factor that is holding back UTStarcom’s sustainable profitability is its operating cost base. While the restructuring has reined in annual operating costs by ~$100mn from a peak of $650mn in FY05 (excluding US$250mn in restructuring charges) to a projected $545mn in FY06, this level may still be too high for UTSI’s base of gross profits.India could be a surprise, but business terms are likely tougher than in China Unless revenues pick up strongly, the key to profitability is through further cost cutsHigh fixed cost based poses continue risk to earningsWe have already assumed in our model that UTStarcom management will cut costs further in FY07 and FY08. However, even with this reduced operating expense assumptions, we are only projecting UTSI to achieve marginal levels of profitability in FY07 and FY08, unless PAS revenues are far more resilient than we have expected or IPTV revenues kick in more strongly over the course of the next year or so. If UTStarcom fails to meet our revenue projections or secure the additional cost savings, there is a real risk that the company may not meet our breakeven earnings projections in FY07 and FY08. Restructuring or asset sale to unlock value Earlier, management announced that UTStarcom’s board of directors had established a special committee to “examine a range of short and long-termalternatives” with the aim of optimizing the value of the company and its opportunities with respect to the share price. We concede that management efforts to restructure the operations may result in a sale of some assets that could unlock value for shareholders, but we also believe that this is likely neither a quick nor an easy fix given the divergent profile of the various business units in UTStarcom. Selling attractive assets like the IPTVbusiness would be feasible, but would leave behind an unattractive mix of assets.Disposing of unattractive assets like the handset business or the PAS franchise isunlikely to generate a good price given the more modest operating prospects of these operations.Recommendation – SellWe are downgrading our recommendation on UTStarcom from Neutral to Sell.We believe that the company has a reasonable chance of meeting its target to return to profitability in 1H07, but it is premature to assume that it can achieve asufficiently robust normalized level of profitability to support the current share price.The current share price assumes that either mature businesses like PAS and handsets will deliver sound results while emerging revenue streams like IPTV take off faster than we have projected, or key businesses will be acquired at favorable terms. We have little hard evidence at this time to assume that the bestcase scenario will pan out. Until there is greater visibility on the company’s operating outlook, we believe that there is downside risk to levels that reflect amore modest premium to UTStarcom’s projected book value of ~$7 per share.What would make us more positive?We would reconsider our negative opinion on the stock if UTStarcom is able to:ô€‚„ Dispose of key assets at favorable terms, orô€‚„ Deliver a sustainably stronger than expected operating performance with enhanced operating visibility.